by Ron Heuer, District 12, Supervisor
Schedule II employee salary increases. This is absolutely a mess and one more time
the taxpayers took it on the chin. The reason it is a mess, is, our county does
not have a viable employee performance evaluation system in place. Salary
increases for the Schedule II employees are simply justified by the Personnel
Advisory Committee with little input from any source.
I sat at the table as this committee met (twice) and it was a matter of pulling numbers out of the sky. For example, Mr. Dorner walked into the meeting with recommendations for five employees to be increased. In a matter of minutes the list grew to nine employees, and then almost as an afterthought, Mr. Barlow suggested adding an additional $1,000 for the Corporate Counsel. No justification other than that employee hadn’t had an increase for a while. The following Board members are on this committee: Weidner, Barlow, Hutter, Wagner, Paphlam, Shillin, Sinkula Heidmann and Mayer. Shillin and Sinkula were the only two members that voted against these increases. At the December Board meeting, I made a mistake. As in that meeting because when I presented a motion to table these increases until the January board meeting, I assumed the Personnel Committee would revisit the proposed raises and take action on them before presenting them to the board again in January. I gave them way too much credit! I forgot I was dealing with the government where common sense does not prevail. However, following the December meeting I did send a letter to each of the board members with details of this salary increase in hopes they would take this issue up with members of the Personnel Committee. Guess what? With exception of two board members, nothing, nix, nada, zero, zip, was done with this information. The do-nothing board one more time lived up to its reputation and delivered to the taxpayer another unjustifiable salary expense. The motion was brought up again in the January meeting and I again offered a motion to send it back to committee to have them do their homework and that motion was defeated. The December Motion that was tabled was brought up and that passed; the following people voted against these salary increases Larry Kirchman, Ron Heuer, Dennis Cravillion, Linda Sinkula, Donald Delebreau, and Kaye Shillin. The rest of our voted for the mostly unwarranted raises.
I sat at the table as this committee met (twice) and it was a matter of pulling numbers out of the sky. For example, Mr. Dorner walked into the meeting with recommendations for five employees to be increased. In a matter of minutes the list grew to nine employees, and then almost as an afterthought, Mr. Barlow suggested adding an additional $1,000 for the Corporate Counsel. No justification other than that employee hadn’t had an increase for a while. The following Board members are on this committee: Weidner, Barlow, Hutter, Wagner, Paphlam, Shillin, Sinkula Heidmann and Mayer. Shillin and Sinkula were the only two members that voted against these increases. At the December Board meeting, I made a mistake. As in that meeting because when I presented a motion to table these increases until the January board meeting, I assumed the Personnel Committee would revisit the proposed raises and take action on them before presenting them to the board again in January. I gave them way too much credit! I forgot I was dealing with the government where common sense does not prevail. However, following the December meeting I did send a letter to each of the board members with details of this salary increase in hopes they would take this issue up with members of the Personnel Committee. Guess what? With exception of two board members, nothing, nix, nada, zero, zip, was done with this information. The do-nothing board one more time lived up to its reputation and delivered to the taxpayer another unjustifiable salary expense. The motion was brought up again in the January meeting and I again offered a motion to send it back to committee to have them do their homework and that motion was defeated. The December Motion that was tabled was brought up and that passed; the following people voted against these salary increases Larry Kirchman, Ron Heuer, Dennis Cravillion, Linda Sinkula, Donald Delebreau, and Kaye Shillin. The rest of our voted for the mostly unwarranted raises.
Have you heard the Kewaunee County Highway Commissioner is retiring? Commissioner Dale Jandrin announced his
retirement to the full Board at the October Board meeting. Not so fast! Now, at the County Highway
Committee of Jan 21, it came out that Mr. Jandrin is lobbying with the County
Administrator Mr. Dorner to resign (not retire) from the position as
Commissioner and would come back into the Kewaunee County Highway Department as
a hourly wage employee.
This is a bad idea for the following reasons: An employee who holds what would be
considered a Director level position (Commissioner) has forged relationships
with their staff; there are loyalties to consider. Normally that Director knows the operation
very well and forgets he is no longer the boss.
This causes conflict with the staff.
What about those employees that were disciplined by the resigning
Director who now is working daily with the person who handled their
disciplinary actions. Will or would this perhaps cause dissention within the
workforce? Also, the new Director just
coming into the organization has to deal with the likelihood of being
undermined by the previous Director both with the office staff and those
employees with loyalties to the previous Director.
Are we setting yet another precedence with this kind of
appointment? Should this be left up to the Administrator to make this kind of
“deal” for an employee? Should this not be a decision made by the board? Let
your District Supervisor hear your position on this. Call the Administrator and
let him know your thoughts. Mr. Dorner has not yet made a final decision about
this.
Twenty-two months ago at the second board meeting I attended
I correctly observed that the only way we could change things in this County
would be to change out some of these board members who are not adequately
representing the taxpayers of this county.
We now have, for the first time since 2000 a good number of qualified,
concerned citizens who are running for the County Board.
Now it’s up to you! Notify
friends, relatives, in-laws, outlaws, neighbors, and all those who are
registered to vote. Make them aware how
important it is they vote in this election. Encourage those who are not registered to vote
to get themselves registered and to participate in this important
election. If you want further details or be part of my newsletter recipients
email me at: ronheuer@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment